So the 1.5 engine is not using a wet-belt? That could be a serious improvement if the engine is really more reliable than the 1.0 Btw are you referring to the 3- or 4-cyclinder 1.5 engine? I got confused from the specs I found Ford 1.5L EcoBoost Dragon Engine (3-cylinder) Ford 1.5L EcoBoost I4 Engine (4-cylinder)
It makes sense as the 100PS and 125PS engines are made on the same production line, and phisically identical, and the 100, is a restricted version of the 125, made for "political" or marketing reasons, the "electronic" restriction, and them being phisically identical, saves production costs (only one engine has to be made for 2 or more power
The 1.0 Ecoboost engine is a reliable engine that gets great fuel economy. It has good torque and is peppy for its size. The 1.0 Ecoboost is a three-cylinder engine that makes 123 horsepower and 125 lb-ft of torque.
In 2009, Ford introduced the EcoBoost engine family, boasting various cylinder configurations, sizes, applications, and power outputs for modern passenger cars. The economic engine family ranges from small 1.0-liter three-cylinder engines to 2.3-liter four-cylinder units, 3.5-liter V6s, 2.7-liter V8s, and 3.5-liter V8s.
The Ford Fiesta Ecoboost, with the Blue Oval’s new 1-litre three-cylinder petrol turbo in its top state of tune. The availability of this Ecoboost engine spells the end for the old 118bhp 1.
1.0L EcoBoost Reliability. Is the Ford 1.0 EcoBoost engine reliable? Yes, we believe this engine earns average to above average remarks for reliability. The 1.0L EcoBoost didn’t earn the best reputation in its early days. However, all brand new engines and designs have their share of kinks to work out.
500+. 450. Torque (pound-feet) 450+. 415. 475+. 510. Like the Ford EcoBoost V6 engine family, the Hurricane 3.0L I-6 lineup employs twin-turbos as a core part of its general operation. Unlike The Blue Oval’s long-running engine family however, there aren’t any higher or lower displacement offshoots or variants, since Stellantis instead In real world driving, this 1.0-litre is also likely to return better fuel economy than the EcoBoost – even though both claim an identical 65.7mpg figure and emit 99g/km of CO2.
For example Ford says its smallest EcoBoost 1.0-litre three-cylinder engine is as powerful as the old, heavier, four-cylinder 1.6-litre engine – and far more frugal. The popularity of EcoBoost engines has increased in recent years as awareness has been raised about the potential harm of diesel emissions, and interest has grown in petrol
